Rashmi/Mugdha: Literal representation of contrast is clear – black and white cell phone, feet sizes, bald and head on hair. The photo with the tree – not sure about that. Overall, the interpretation of Contrast as that can be captured in a photograph using lighting, tone, composition or then in terms of subject matter is missing – its literal! And an interpretation is what would make a “moving” image. 5/10
2 comments:
Rashmi/Mugdha:
All literal, immediate and lazy. Go beyond the obvious. REDO!
Rashmi/Mugdha:
Literal representation of contrast is clear – black and white cell phone, feet sizes, bald and head on hair. The photo with the tree – not sure about that. Overall, the interpretation of Contrast as that can be captured in a photograph using lighting, tone, composition or then in terms of subject matter is missing – its literal! And an interpretation is what would make a “moving” image.
5/10
Post a Comment